|
Radiation Safety Office Henry Ford Health System
1. Radiation Physics
|
|
|
Chapter 1: Radiation Physics
Introduction
Why do we have this course? Table I-1: Procedures of Particular Concern to FDA
¤ FDA 1994
¥ Note: The risk of adverse radiation effects originating from a medically necessary procedure is almost
always offset by the benefit received by the patient. However, in order to improve the
benefit-risk tradeoff for these procedures, it is incumbent on the operator to
understand radiation
effects and utilize methods to avoid them or reduce their severity.
Radiation Exposure and Public Health Measures
Figure I-1: Sources of Radiation Exposure
Clearly good operator training is a very important means of reducing medical radiation doses. This program is designed to give a minimal understanding of radiation use and effects in medicine to assist in optimizing the techniques used. Basic Radiation Physics Knowledge of basic radiation physics is necessary for properly understanding fluoroscopy safety. Courtesy of Albert Einstein Archives
Radiation What is radiation? Radiation: is the transfer of energy in the form of particles or waves. Energy: the ability to do work (Force·Distance) X-rays are electromagnetic radiation. Electromagnetic radiation is a form of pure energy which is carried by waves of photons. Electromagnetic radiation is also known as light. Visible light, Radio and X-rays are all forms of electromagnetic radiation which vary in energy and thereby wavelength and frequency as well (Figure 1-1). Figure 1-1: Forms of Electromagnetic Radiation Courtesy of Phil Rauch and Laura Smith, 2000
Ionizing Radiation X-ray radiation contains more energy than ultraviolet, infrared, radio waves, microwaves or visible light. X-ray radiation has sufficient energy (>30 eV) to cause ionizations. An ionization is a process whereby the radiation removes an outer shell electron from an atom (Figure 1-2). Figure 1-2: The Ionization Process Alan Jackson, 2001
Non-ionizing radiation does not contain sufficient energy (30 eV) to cause ionizations (Figure 1-3). While some non-ionizing radiation can be harmful, the ionization process is clearly able to cause chemical changes in important changes to biologically important molecules (e.g. DNA). Figure 1-3: Non-Ionizing Radiations Courtesy of Alan Jackson, 2001
X-ray Production FIgure 1-4: X-ray Production (Bremstrahlung) Courtesy of the University of Michigan Student Chapter of the Health Physics Society
Since the degree of interaction of the accelerated electron with the target nucleus can vary, the energy spectrum, or distribution of energy, of the X-rays produced by the bremsstrahlung process is continuous. As smaller number of characteristic x-rays are also produced as excited electrons interact with the electrons of the target atoms. The X-rays produced from this interaction, with a given orbital electron, have a single specific energy (discrete) instead of a continuous spectrum. Mammographic x-ray tubes are designed to maximize characteristic production to optimize breast tissue imaging. The amount of characteristic X-rays in a fluoroscopy beam is relatively low. The lower energy X-rays are absorbed within the X-ray tube. This reduces the number of lower energy X-rays in the resultant spectrum since the lower energy X-ray are less penetrating. The beam is considered "harder" when there is more filtration. Most X-ray manufacturers add filtration, commonly consisting of aluminum, since lower energy X-rays do not contribute to images and add to patient dose. The resulting x-ray spectrum energy (Figure 1-5) is a mixture of the characteristic and bremsstrahlung radiation, less the primarily low energy X-rays absorbed by the X-ray tube (and added filtration). The maximum energy of the X-ray produced is equal to the maximum potential applied across the x-ray tube. This peak X-ray energy is usually described with the unit kVp (kilovolt peak or kilovolt potential). The type of target anode, potential (kVp) and added filtration produce a beam of a given "quality" which implies specific shape of an X-ray spectrum. Figure 1-5: Simplified X-ray Spectrum Alan Jackson, 2001
X-ray Machine Parameters The quantity of electron flow (current) in the X-ray tube is described in units of milliamperes (mA). The rate of X-ray production is directly proportional to the X-ray tube current. Higher mA values indicate more electrons are striking the tungsten target, thereby producing more X-rays. The voltage (kVp) primarily determines the maximum X-ray energy produced but also influences the number of X-rays produced. Increasing the kVp attracts more electrons from the filament increasing the rate of X-ray production. However, this relationship is not directly proportional but higher kVp setting will result in a substantial increase in the number of X-rays produced. The total number of X-rays produced at a set kVp depends directly on the product of the mA and exposure time and is typically described in terms of mA-s or mAs. Fluoroscopy is usually performed using 2 to 5 mA current at a peak electrical potential of 75 to 125 kVp. X-ray Production Efficiency and Heat Loading The production of x-rays is a relatively inefficient process so that only a small fraction of the energy imparted by the decelerating electrons is converted into X-rays. The remaining energy is converted to heat. Thus, the production and dissipation of heat in the X-ray tube is a serious consideration. Thus, most x-ray machines have rotating anodes to spread out the heat to prevent anode melting. This is the reason why you can hear an X-ray machine make noise. Most fluoroscopic x-ray machine anodes are primarily based on tungsten due to tungsten's high melting point, excellent heat transmission, and high atomic number. In spite of tungsten's favorable qualities, with sufficiently high usage, X-ray production is prevented by the system to protect the tube. Substantial improvements have been recently made in the ability of fluoroscopic X-ray equipment to remove waste heat and thereby maintain high beam outputs. Figure 1-6: Heat Production Courtesy of: Phil Rauch and Laura Smith, 2000
Divergent Nature of X-ray Radiation Inverse-Square-Law (Radiation intensity with distance) Since the initial beam
travels in straight but divergent directions, geometry in a three dimensional
world dictates that the radiation intensity will decrease with
the inverse square of the distance. Consequently, the number of X-rays traveling through a unit area decreases with increasing distance.
Likewise, radiation level decreases with increasing distance since exposure is directly proportional to
the number of X-rays interacting in a unit area. The intensity of the radiation is
described by the inverse square law equation: This effect is shown graphically in Figure 1-7: Figure 1-7: Inverse Square Law Courtesy of Scott Sorenson, 2000
1-Meter Distance: 1,000 X-rays pass through a
This relationship indicates that doubling the
distance from a radiation source decreases the radiation level by a factor of
four. Conversely, halving the distance, increases the radiation level by a factor of
four. Intelligent application of inverse square law principles can yield significant reductions in
both patient and
operator radiation exposures. X-rays
Interactions with matter Figure 1-8: X-ray Interaction-Imaging Considerations Courtesy of Scott Sorenson, 2000
Complete absorption: X-ray energy is completely absorbed by the tissue. This produces radiation dose to the patient. Partial absorption with scatter: Scattering involves a partial transfer of energy to tissue, with the resulting scattered X-ray having less energy and a different trajectory. This interaction does not provide any useful information (degrades image quality) and is the primary source of radiation exposure to staff. X-ray Interaction with Matter The probability of X-ray interaction is a function of tissue electron density, tissue thickness, and X-ray energy (kVp). Electron dense material like bone and contrast dye attenuates more X-rays from the X-ray beam than less dense material (muscle, fat, air). The differential rate of interaction provides the contrast that forms the image. Tissue Electron Density Interaction Effects: As electron density increases, the interaction with X-rays substantially increases. Higher atomic number materials have increased electron density. Thus, bone, which is substantially comprised of calcium, produces more attenuation, than tissue, which is comprised of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen (all of which have a lower electron density or atomic number than calcium). Thus, the image of bone and soft tissue has contrast, or difference, between bone and soft tissue. The concept of contrast and electron density X-ray interaction can be shown in Figure 1-9. Assume 1,000 X-rays strike the following body portions. The number of X-rays reaching the recording media (film, TV monitor) directly effect the image's brightness. Figure 1-9: Electron Density and Image Contrast Courtesy of Scott Sorenson, 2000
In this
example, 900 X-rays are capable of penetrating the
soft tissue, while only 400
penetrate the bone (Higher electron density compared with soft
tissue). The contrast between the bone and soft tissue is (900-400)/900 =
0.56. As tissue thickness increases, the probability of X-ray interaction increases. Thicker body portions remove more X-rays from the useful beam compared to thinner portions (Figure 1-10). In fluoroscopy, this effect must be compensated for while panning across variable tissue thickness to provide consistent information to the image-recording device. Figure 1-10: X-ray Penetration as a Function of Thickness Courtesy of Scott Sorenson, 2000
Energy
Higher kVp X-rays are less likely to interact with tissue and are described as more "penetrating." Increasing
kVp, thereby generating more penetrating radiation, reduces the relative image contrast (or visible
difference) between dense and less dense tissue. Conversely, less radiation dose results to the patient since
less X-rays are absorbed. Figure 1-11 illustrates this effect. The X-rays that do not reach the
image recording device are either absorbed in the patient (patient radiation dose) or are scattered
throughout the exam room (staff radiation dose) Figure 1-11: X-ray Penetration as a Function of Energy Courtesy of Scott Sorenson, 2000
How does these principles of physics relate to radiation safety? (Figure 1-12) Figure 1-12: Square Hole-Round Peg Courtesy of Alan Jackson, 2001
The fundamental tie between Physics and fluoroscopy Radiation Safety occurs during the sequence of steps which lead to radiation biological effects. These steps are deposition of energy (Figure 1-13) and biochemical changes caused by X-rays (Figure 1-14). Figure1-13: Deposition of Energy Alan Jackson, 2001
Figure1-14: Biochemical changes Alan Jackson, 2001
The biochemical changes produced by ionizing radiation radiations are the fundamental event leading to radiation damage. The amount of energy absorbed in a system is the best way to quantify the radiation damage. The amount of energy absorbed per mass is known as radiation dose.
Description of Radiation Exposure/Units Figure 1-15: Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen Courtesy of Scott Sorenson, 2000
The biological
effectiveness of radiations vary. The unit rem (radiation
equivalent man, now person) is used to compare dose received by different types of radiations (e.g. alpha
particles) which have a different capacity for causing harm than X-ray
radiation. This unit is properly termed dose equivalent. The dose
equivalent is the product of the dose times a quality factor. Occupational radiation exposure is
described in terms of dose equivalent. There is an international (SI) unit for
dose equivalent termed the Sievert (Sv). The conversion between the units
is: 100 rem = 1 Sv. |
|
Copyright © 2001
Radiation Safety Office at Henry Ford Health System
|